It’s on the ASAN blog. (I wrote it for them!)
Loved the piece, but I have a question. ASAN is very pro-Identity First language, but you used person-first language “people with developmental disabilities.” Why didn’t you say “developmentally disabled people?”
I will admit that I’m not very knowledgeable of other mental disabilities outside of autism so I don’t know if developmentally disabled people (or people with developmental disabilities) prefer person-first language.
ASAN didn’t say anything about it- I think it’s because there are developmental disabilities that aren’t autism and where people who have them go with person-first? (Cerebral palsy and Down’s Syndrome come to mind as two that go for person first.)
Oh. Ok. I really should learn more about other developmental disabilities.
I know people with Down’s Syndrome in the English-speaking world almost universally prefer person-first language. I think most groups do.
“When we call people r—–s as an insult, we are reinforcing the concept that people who have developmental disabilities...
I know less about CP advocacy than some other groups, and I’m not sure if there is a CP self-advocacy group in the US....
woot!
No, it still applies until you specify that you know about CP specifically. Which you apparently do. (It works for x,y,z...
Some groups genuinely prefer it. Could we accept that, extend to them the respect we want? Different people have...
Oh. That clears it up. Thanks.
It all depends on how they see their disability. Where we see it as an identity, others might see their disability as a...
Design by Simon Fletcher. Powered by Tumblr.
© Copyright 2010